Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Patients: An Assessment of Nasal Endoscopy and Speech Evaluation Findings

Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Patients: An Assessment of Nasal Endoscopy and Speech Evaluation Findings

Authors

  • Ashley Soaper, MD 1. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
  • Lara Reichert, MD MPH* 4. Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois , 5. Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
  • Jennifer Arzu, MPH 3. Northwestern University, Feinberg College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3990-3146
  • Benjamin Yu 2. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Margaret Mumm 3. Northwestern University, Feinberg College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • Laura Rosenthal, MD 3. Northwestern University, Feinberg College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, 4. Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5257-0182

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to assess the correlation between nasal endoscopy and speech evaluation findings in a population of 22q11.2DS patients undergoing operative intervention for correction of VPI at a quaternary care pediatric hospital. We hypothesized using a modified grading scale, certain nasal endoscopy findings such as larger pre-operative velopharyngeal gap size would correlate with perceptual speech assessment findings such as decreased intelligibility, increased hypernasality, and increased nasal emission. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted, reviewing fifty-two pediatric patients with 22q11.2DS who presented to the VPI clinic and were candidates for surgery at an urban, quaternary care children’s hospital between 2010 and 2019. The following information was collected: demographic information, presenting symptoms of 22q11DS, speech therapy evaluation data, VPI surgical data, and complications. Thirty-two patients had complete preoperative records and thus were ultimately included in the review. Results: Twelve patients (37.5%) had a small gap size, 13 patients (40.6%) had a moderate gap size, and 5 patients (15.6%) had a large gap size. There was no statistically significant correlation between intelligibility and right lateral wall movement (rho: 0.315, p-value: 0.218), left lateral wall movement (rho: 0.175, p-value: 0.502), or AP movement (rho: 0.172, p-value: 0.525). Velum length was negatively correlated with intelligibility (rho:-0.486, p-value:0.048). Conclusion: Our data emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary team when evaluating complex 22q11.2DS patients. Our unique scale provides an objective measure of nasal endoscopy by consistently documenting the findings of AP movement, gap shape, gap size, as well as other details such as velar notch and presence of Passavant’s ridge.

References

Oskarsdóttir S, Vujic M, Fasth A. Incidence and prevalence of the 22q11 deletion syndrome: apopulation-based study in Western Sweden. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(2):148-151. doi:10.1136/

ADC .2003.026880.

Rouillon I, Leboulanger N, Roger G, et al. Velopharyngoplasty for Noncleft Velopharynge al Insufficiency. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg.2009;135(7):652. doi:10.1001/archoto.2009.64.

Digilio M, Marino B, Capolino R, Dallapiccola B. Clinical manifestations of Deletion 22q11.2

syndrome (DiGeorge/Velo-Cardio-Facial syndrome). Images Paediatr Cardiol. 2005;7(2):23-34.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22368650.Accessed May 27, 2020.

Speech-Language Disorders in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Best Practices for Diagnosis and Management. Cynthia B. Solot Debbie Sell Anne Mayne Adriane L. Baylis Christina Persson Oksana Jackson Donna M. McDonald-McGinn.https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/2019

_AJSLP-16-0147

Saunders NC, Hartley BEJ, Sell D, Sommerlad B. Velopharyngeal insufficiency following

adenoidectomy1. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci.2004;29(6):686-688. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2273.2

00870.x.

Witzel MA, Rich RH, Margar-Bacal F, Cox C.Velopharyngeal insufficiency after adenoidectom

y: an 8-year review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngology.1986;11(1):15-20. doi:10.1016/S0165-5

(86)80023-4.

Croft CB, Shprintzen RJ, Ruben RJ. HypernasalSpeech following Adenotonsillectomy. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg. 1981;89(2):179-188.doi:10.1177/019459988108900208.

Golding-Kushner KJ, Argamaso RV, Cotton RT, et al. Standardization for the reporting of

nasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy: a report from the International Working 219 Group. Cleft PalateJ. 1990; 27:337-347.

Tieu DD, Gerber ME, Milczuk HA, et al. Generation of Consensus in the Application of a Rating Scale to Nasendoscopic Assessment of Velopharyngeal Function. Arch Otolaryngology

Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(10):923–928.doi:10.1001/archotol.2013.203

Bowen, C. (2011). Table1: Intelligibility. Retrieved from http://www.speech languagetherapy.com/ on May 28, 2020.

McWilliams BJ, Phillips BJ. Velopharyngeal Incompetence: Audio Seminars in Speech

Pathology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, Inc.;1979. http://www.jclpca.org/viewimage.asp?img

=JCleftLipPalateCraniofacAnomal 2014114126536f1.jpg

Alexandra, J., Sell, D., Sweeney, T., Harding- Bell, A., & Williams, A. (2006). The cleft audit

protocol for speech-augmented: A validated and reliable measure for auditing cleft speech.

Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 43(3), 272-288. Americleft Speech Outcomes Project, Americleft Task Force

Samantha C. (2014). Introduction to the SPAT-D-II [PowerPoint slides]. Prezi. https:// prezi.com/dwxbbbvrj0om/spat-d-ii/

Lam DJ, Starr JR, Perkins JA, Lewis CW, Eblen LE, Dunlap J, Sie KC. A comparison of nasendoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy in assessing velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg. 2006 Mar;13 4(3):394-402. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.11.028.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-25

How to Cite

1.
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Patients: An Assessment of Nasal Endoscopy and Speech Evaluation Findings. Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology Research [Internet]. 2023 Jan. 25 [cited 2024 Sep. 19];4(01):124-30. Available from: http://jorr.info/index.php/jorr/article/view/67